A recent poll conducted among 430 first-time American voters revealed that a majority of Generation Z individuals oppose regulations that would restrict their use of social media platforms, despite being aware of the potential negative effects on mental and physical health. The study, conducted by the Stanford Deliberative Democracy Lab, found that over 60% of new voters are against requiring parental consent for children under 16 to use social media. Additionally, more than 85% of young people believe there should be no restrictions on when they can receive social media notifications.
Generation Z, encompassing individuals between the ages of 12 and 27, are heavy users of social media platforms like Instagram, TikTok, and Snapchat. As this demographic gains more influence within the electorate, their perspectives on social and political issues, including social media use, could have a significant impact on election outcomes.
Despite concerns about the negative impacts of social media on mental health and addiction, young people are not in favor of government-imposed restrictions on social media use. Various proposals related to age requirements, time limits, and digital literacy training did not receive majority support among participants in the poll.
The reluctance to support social media regulations does not indicate trust in the companies behind these platforms. Researchers emphasize that the lack of trust in social media companies is prevalent among first-time voters, with less than 10% expressing trust in their actions.
Ultimately, the study highlights the complex relationship between Generation Z and social media, suggesting that these platforms serve as essential means of connection and support for young individuals. The research was conducted through a collaborative effort between several organizations, including Close Up Foundation, Stanford’s Deliberative Democracy Lab, Helena, the Generation Lab, and USC Marshall’s Neely Center.
